The legal battle over the government’s decision to impose VAT on private school fees is set to be heard in the High Court from 1 April to 3 April. The challenge, backed by the Independent Schools Council (ISC), will be led by six families contesting the introduction of VAT on education provided by independent primary and secondary schools.
[See also: The 25 best UK senior schools in 2024]
Legal challenge and key arguments
The case is filed against Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The claimants argue that the imposition of VAT on school fees is already having a significant impact, forcing families to reconsider their options. Representing a diverse group, including families with children in SEND, faith-based, bilingual, and girls-only schools, the claimants argue the policy disproportionately affects certain educational communities.
[See also: Can an educational trust help families pay off higher private school fees?]
Leading the legal challenge is Lord Pannick KC, who will argue that the VAT policy restricts access to independent education and violates the right to education under Article 2 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights. He will also claim that the policy contravenes Article 14 of the Convention by causing unnecessary and discriminatory harm to specific groups of children. The claimants seek a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Human Rights Act, asserting that amendments to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 conflict with ECHR protections.
Expedited court proceedings
The case is being heard on an expedited basis after a court decision this month in which Lord Pannick successfully argued the urgency of the case, citing the immediate impact of VAT on parents and students. The court also ruled that the ISC’s case, represented by law firm Kingsley Napley, would be combined with a separate legal action brought by Education Not Discrimination, represented by SinclairsLaw.
[See also: Introducing the Spear’s Schools Index 2024]
Julie Robinson, CEO of the ISC, described the introduction of VAT on school fees as ‘an unprecedented tax on education’.
‘The diversity within independent schools has been overlooked in the rush to implement this policy, leaving families and children to bear the brunt of its negative consequences,’ she said. Robinson added: ‘This legal action aims to protect their rights and ensure their choices in education are not unfairly restricted.’
High Court fast-tracks VAT legal proceedings
In the earlier hearing, the High Court of England and Wales agreed to fast-track the legal action in response to Lord Pannick’s argument that parents require clarity given the immediate financial implications of the policy, which took effect on January 1, 2025.
[See also: British boarding schools have a low-tech solution for a very modern problem]
Government counsel opposed the request, seeking more time to review the evidence. However, Mr Justice Chamberlain dismissed these arguments and ruled that the case should proceed on an expedited basis.
Sophie Kemp, partner and Head of Public Law at Kingsley Napley, welcomed the decision at the time: ‘Mr Justice Chamberlain has agreed that our case will be heard on a “rolled-up” basis, meaning that both the permission stage and substantive arguments will be considered in a single hearing. This should help bring a resolution to the matter more swiftly.’