Closing the News of the World is a masterstroke, the sort of bold move only a tactical business genius could make
Suggestions that Rupert Murdoch is succumbing to senility have been laid to rest with the closure of the News of the World, announced today, as of this Sunday. It is a masterstroke, for several reasons, the sort of bold move only a tactical business genius could make. While most people would think of small actions, he can see the whole chessboard and knows when a piece has to go – few people think this way, and those that do end up where Murdoch is.
First, it appears to offer a root-and-branch cleansing. The earth has been salted. The title, indelibly associated with what appears to be the most depraved, inhumane hacking (murder victims, terrorism victims, dead soldiers), will never rise again. It seems to be a great sacrifice, especially since this was Murdoch's first English paper acquisition.
Second, from a business perspective, he can lay off hundreds of journalists, editors and production staff at a stroke, without the lengthy strikes which saw his papers' move to Wapping. Taking the Sun seven-daily made sense before the NOTW news started to leak out like a foul-smelling haemorrhage; now he has the opportunity. This is a disaster for the staff, most of whom were not associated with the hacking and are paying for others' mistakes. I can't say I'll miss the paper, but this guillotining is bitter.
Third, he may have allayed some fears about the takeover of BSkyB; with one fewer title on his books there may be less concern about plurality, although presumably NOTW readers will switch to the Sun on Sundays. Also, by shutting the paper down, Murdoch hopes to demonstrate moral leadership, the sort that people argue has been diminished by the scandal.
Finally, Murdoch may think he has saved Rebekah Brooks, who is apparently more important than hundreds of employees on the NOTW.
This, however, is where he has fallen down. The rest of the media and the wider world have spotted this ruse, and no-one forgets that the acts alleged would have taken place under her editorship. She has defended herself robustly, but I cannot believe she will emerge unscathed. There will be at least two enquiries and acres of bad publicity to follow, most of which will lead to her door, one way or another, and there are now hundreds of hacks who hate her and have no jobs to fear losing in telling what they know.
People are not taking their eye off of Brooks, despite the chunks of meat Murdoch is throwing into the water, Medea-like, to distract us.
It has been a very successful stunt (if you can call this action, which affects so many, a stunt), but the pressure on Brooks will remain. Murdoch remains the master, but even he can't cut this one off.
Full statement from James Murdoch on the closure of the News of the World below:
News International today announces that this Sunday, 10 July 2011, will be the last issue of the News of the World.
Making the announcement to staff, James Murdoch, Deputy Chief Operating Officer, News Corporation, and Chairman, News International said:
“I have important things to say about the News of the World and the steps we are taking to address the very serious problems that have occurred.
It is only right that you as colleagues at News International are first to hear what I have to say and that you hear it directly from me. So thank you very much for coming here and listening.
You do not need to be told that The News of the World is 168 years old. That it is read by more people than any other English language newspaper. That it has enjoyed support from Britain's largest advertisers. And that it has a proud history of fighting crime, exposing wrong-doing and regularly setting the news agenda for the nation.
When I tell people why I am proud to be part of News Corporation, I say that our commitment to journalism and a free press is one of the things that sets us apart. Your work is a credit to this.
The good things the News of the World does, however, have been sullied by behaviour that was wrong. Indeed, if recent allegations are true, it was inhuman and has no place in our Company.
The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account. But it failed when it came to itself.
In 2006, the police focused their investigations on two men. Both went to jail. But the News of the World and News International failed to get to the bottom of repeated wrongdoing that occurred without conscience or legitimate purpose.
Wrongdoers turned a good newsroom bad and this was not fully understood or adequately pursued.
As a result, the News of the World and News International wrongly maintained that these issues were confined to one reporter. We now have voluntarily given evidence to the police that I believe will prove that this was untrue and those who acted wrongly will have to face the consequences.
This was not the only fault.
The paper made statements to Parliament without being in the full possession of the facts. This was wrong.
The Company paid out-of-court settlements approved by me. I now know that I did not have a complete picture when I did so. This was wrong and is a matter of serious regret.
Currently, there are two major and ongoing police investigations. We are cooperating fully and actively with both. You know that it was News International who voluntarily brought evidence that led to opening Operation Weeting and Operation Elveden. This full cooperation will continue until the Police's work is done.
We have also admitted liability in civil cases. Already, we have settled a number of prominent cases and set up a Compensation Scheme, with cases to be adjudicated by former High Court judge Sir Charles Gray. Apologising and making amends is the right thing to do.
Inside the Company, we set up a Management and Standards Committee that is working on these issues and that has hired Olswang to examine past failings and recommend systems and practices that over time should become standards for the industry. We have committed to publishing Olswang's terms of reference and eventual recommendations in a way that is open and transparent. We have welcomed broad public inquiries into press standards and police practices and will cooperate with them fully.
So, just as I acknowledge we have made mistakes, I hope you and everyone inside and outside the Company will acknowledge that we are doing our utmost to fix them, atone for them, and make sure they never happen again.
Having consulted senior colleagues, I have decided that we must take further decisive action with respect to the paper.
This Sunday will be the last issue of the News of the World.
Colin Myler will edit the final edition of the paper.
In addition, I have decided that all of the News of the World's revenue this weekend will go to good causes.
While we may never be able to make up for distress that has been caused, the right thing to do is for every penny of the circulation revenue we receive this weekend to go to organisations – many of whom are long-term friends and partners – that improve life in Britain and are devoted to treating others with dignity.
We will run no commercial advertisements this weekend. Any advertising space in this last edition will be donated to causes and charities that wish to expose their good works to our millions of readers.
These are strong measures. They are made humbly and out of respect. I am convinced they are the right thing to do.
Many of you, if not the vast majority of you, are either new to the Company or have had no connection to the News of the World during the years when egregious behaviour occurred.
I can understand how unfair these decisions may feel. Particularly, for colleagues who will leave the Company. Of course, we will communicate next steps in detail and begin appropriate consultations.
You may see these changes as a price loyal staff at the News of the World are paying for the transgressions of others. So please hear me when I say that your good work is a credit to journalism.
I do not want the legitimacy of what you do to be compromised by acts of others. I want all journalism at News International to be beyond reproach. I insist that this organisation lives up to the standard of behaviour we expect of others. And, finally, I want you all to know that it is critical that the integrity of every journalist who has played fairly is restored.
Thank you for listening.”